I think the version number was being moved a few lines up to keep grouping
more logical? I think Glenn is dealing with the string in 6699?
Thank you,
Clay
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, sanjay nadkarni (Laptop) wrote:
> I see that there is a version field added. The command exists. What exactly
> is being versioned.
>
> -Sanjay
>
>
> Clay Baenziger wrote:
>> Hi Jack,
>> I think this looks good, it should certainly make life more simple for
>> our users.
>> I do think checking for just dots in the service name is a little too
>> narrow. I was looking at the section "Restrictions on domain (DNS) names"
>> in RFC 3696 and believe we may instead want to check that there's only
>> [a-zA-Z0-9_] in the name to ensure there's not unanticipated problems as
>> currently it looks like I could get an ampersand or pound sign in which
>> could be difficult for some of the installadm shell scripts and the DNS
>> system too. Let me know your thoughts on this or if being C checking for
>> dots is about all that can easily be done at this time.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Clay
>>
>> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Jack Schwartz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone.
>>>
>>> Here is a code review for a couple of small bugfixes:
>>>
>>> 5091 AI install does not work if your service name had . in it.
>>> 4610 most installadm commands need to err out gracefully if not root
>>>
>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~schwartz/090306.1/webrev/
>>>
>>> Please review.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jack
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>
>
