Glenn Lagasse wrote:
> All,
>
> I've got what I believe to be the required changes for 6699.  I've
> addressed what I believe was the intent in the bug originally.  Which is
> to say that I've removed any code and reference to installadm displaying
> a version number.
>
> They are located at:
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~glagasse/slim_6699
>
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6699
>
> That said, as part of some due diligence on my part I trolled around for
> other 'version' references related to AI.  I don't *think* what I've
> found is related, but I'd like to get feedback from others who are
> probably more familiar.
>
> Instances:
>
> usr/src/cmd/installadm/docs/manifest.html
> 283: service name='ai_properties' version='1' type='service'>
>   
This is official document. We will look at it when we review the 
document. These doc files will be replaced for June release.
> usr/src/cmd/auto-install/svc/auto-installer.xml
> 38:     version='1'>
>   
This is the version of the SMF service and it has nothing to do with 
installadm version.
> usr/src/cmd/auto-install/ai_get_manifest.py
> 783:    <Version Number="0.5">
>   
This is just a comment.
> usr/src/cmd/ai-webserver:
> *.py files reference a version number of some sort which appears
> different than what installadm was reporting (1.0 for installadm, 0.5
> for the .py files)
>   
0.5 appears to be the version of the module OptionParser. It has nothing 
to do with installadm version. Can you check with Clay about OptionParser?
> Are any of these additional references relevant to the bug at hand?
> They don't appear to be from my casual observation.
>   
No.

Thanks,
Sundar
> Thanks,
>
> Glenn
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>   


Reply via email to