jan damborsky wrote: > Hi Ethan, > > > On 03/18/09 18:01, Ethan Quach wrote: >> Jan, >> >> I like the underlying concept of complete observability to >> the user of the list of packages to be "added" and "removed", >> but is it premature to push what we've got now to the user-level >> AI manifest? A valid answer is no, but I just want to make sure >> its been considered to keep the lists internal for now, since our >> current list is a bit awkward. > > I think that even if the current package list is not quite polished > as it has to take into account existing deficiencies, it might be > better to make those changes now, since then we will not need to > continue to be aware of this problem in future. > Also, I feel that making this change might help with our effort > to provide consistent user experience for DC and AI, since > DC provides those lists of packages in DC manifests. >
That sounds fine then. >>> >>> Do we happen to know at this point which metacluster will remain >>> after this change happens - slim_install/babel_install ? >>> >>> If babel_install, might it make sense to switch to babel_install >>> in AI now ? >>> >>> Please let me know, what you think about this. David C mentioned at the -eng meeting today that we should go ahead and switch this to babel_install, so please do this. thanks, -ethan
