On 03/19/09 20:28, Ethan Quach wrote: > > > jan damborsky wrote: >> Hi Ethan, >> >> >> On 03/18/09 18:01, Ethan Quach wrote: >>> Jan, >>> >>> I like the underlying concept of complete observability to >>> the user of the list of packages to be "added" and "removed", >>> but is it premature to push what we've got now to the user-level >>> AI manifest? A valid answer is no, but I just want to make sure >>> its been considered to keep the lists internal for now, since our >>> current list is a bit awkward. >> >> I think that even if the current package list is not quite polished >> as it has to take into account existing deficiencies, it might be >> better to make those changes now, since then we will not need to >> continue to be aware of this problem in future. >> Also, I feel that making this change might help with our effort >> to provide consistent user experience for DC and AI, since >> DC provides those lists of packages in DC manifests. >> > > That sounds fine then. > >>>> >>>> Do we happen to know at this point which metacluster will remain >>>> after this change happens - slim_install/babel_install ? >>>> >>>> If babel_install, might it make sense to switch to babel_install >>>> in AI now ? >>>> >>>> Please let me know, what you think about this. > > David C mentioned at the -eng meeting today that we should > go ahead and switch this to babel_install, so please do this.
ok, I will do this. Thank you for clarifying this ! Jan
