Jerry Edwards wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>     Yes these were AI installs using 111 install image and 111 isp 
> packages. We did not see this with
> 110 install image. So if this is a feature is there a way to disable 
> this. We also cannot rsh to the system
> as root. This will break a lot of our automation.

Remove jack/jack from your ai_manifest file.


-ethan

>
>  rsh c23-8 -l root
> Login incorrect
> Connection to c23-8 closed.
>
> Thanks
> Jerry
>
> On 04/ 8/09 03:47 PM, Ethan Quach wrote:
>> Steven,
>>
>> Were these installs via AI?
>>
>> If so, there were bugs filed against AI, 4215 and 7274 (fixed
>> in 111), to fix the fact that root wasn't set up to be a role.
>> i.e. the fact that you were able to log in as root in 110 was a
>> bug.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> -ethan
>>
>>
>> Steven Lau wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Our group installed osol 111 .... after installation completed and 
>>> tried to login as root from console ... and failed to login (see 
>>> below). We don't have this problem on osol 110. Workaround is login 
>>> as jack/jack and su to root.
>>>
>>> Any comments or we will file a bug.
>>>
>>> Thx,
>>>
>>> -Steven
>>>
>>> ----
>>>
>>>
>>> opensolaris console login: root
>>> Password:
>>> Roles can only be assumed by authorized users 
>>> <-----------------------------
>>> Login incorrect
>>> Apr 8 15:03:14 opensolaris login: login account failure: Permission 
>>> denied
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>
> -- 
> Jerry Edwards                                   Sun Microsystems Inc.
> Manager, Network and Platform QA              12 Network Circle
> Phone: (650) 786-4632                           M/S MPK12-126
> Fax: (650) 786-2841                             Menlo Park, CA 94025
>
>
>   

Reply via email to