Just to correct myself: Dave Miner wrote: > MC wrote: ... >> >>> As the native CIFS support is expected "soon" >> >> I thought there was only a CIFS client project, not a CIFS server >> project. :( Can you point me to the CIFS server project? > > True, but we know the CIFS client is going to have some size impact, > too. Whether we should include something like samba that's 50% > duplicative becomes a difficult call as we're allocating out the space > that remains, so I'm still saying we should wait. >
CIFS server support is an active project. Dave
