jan damborsky wrote:
> jan damborsky wrote:
>> Hi Sarah,
>>
>> I have tried to address your TI&TD questions.
>> Please see my comments in line. Where no explicitly
>> specified, they take into account requirements for
>> Slim October release.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> Sarah Jelinek wrote:
>>> -Whole disk or existing Solaris partition only acceptable targets is current
>>> requirement for Slim.
>>>
>>> -Target discovery via orchestrator will still returns all data, gui must 
>>> filter
>>> appropriately. This results in no change to target discovery interfaces.
>>> However, this results in a potential performance issue since the discovery
>>> of upgrade instances is unnecessary.
>>>
>>> -We could separate out os discovery from this.  Currently it is
>>> done after disk discovery via handle_disk_discovery. Should we do this?
>>>   
>> I think that since Upgrade path won't be supported and information about 
>> existing
>> OS instances would be left unused, discovery of OS instances might be 
>> omitted.
> 
> Actually, it seems this is not true. According to existing UI task list
> data about existing Solaris instances are available in October release.
> I am sorry for misleading information.

Hi Jan, which UI task list are you referring to here?  I don't see this
on the UI Roadmap for October that Frank sent out.

-ethan

> 
> Thank you,
> Jan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to