Hi Ethan, Thanks for reviewing this.
> Sarah, > > 1.4.a Can you clarify whether or not we're discovering > UFS instances of Solaris? Or does the lack of > specification imply UFS and ZFS? > It implies both. At this point in time we do have the ability to check both and I see no reason to change that requirement. > 1.7 Same comment as above really. Both. I will state this specifically in the requirements to make it clearer. > > 1.6 and 2.9 I don't recall. Are these requirements > meant to satisfy usage by libbe, or to express > functionality provided by libbe? Specifically, they are a requirement to satisfy zones support for beadm and libbe. So, 2.9 is specifically a requirement so that users can setup a BE from a zone vi beadm. 1.6 is for zones support in libbe. thanks, sarah ***** > thanks, > -ethan > > > > Sarah Jelinek wrote: >> Please review and provide comments by COB Wed, 6/17. >> >> thanks, >> sarah >> **** >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I have posted a set of requirements defined for the Caiman unified >>> engine. They are located at: >>> >>> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/CUD/cud_req.txt >>> >>> There are some more details that need to be added, specifically with >>> regard to observability requirements. A lot of that depends on the >>> consumers of the unified engine. Along with the error handling section. >>> >>> Please review and send comments. >>> >>> Regards, >>> sarah >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> caiman-discuss mailing list >> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
