On 12/ 4/09 12:49 PM, Glenn Lagasse wrote: > Hi Sanjay, > > * sanjay nadkarni (Laptop) (Sanjay.Nadkarni at Sun.COM) wrote: > >> Joe, >> I am looking at Glenn's initial email which indicated that the >> webrev did not include Python 2.6 changes. I am assuming that all >> the updated webrevs are still not in sync with Python 2.6. If this >> is not true then there are a few references to to Python 2.4 and >> also some merge errors. >> > > The bulk of the webrev does not include Python 2.6 changes as we weren't > merged with those changes. The one specific case where that's not true > is for im_pop.py (previously known as DC_tm.py). > > I've got a merge of VMC with python 2.6 workspace which I'm regression > testing right now. I don't plan to send out another webrev based on > this workspace since merge changes shouldn't really need reviewing. > > Does this address any concerns you had? > > Thanks, > > Yes..except please send out the webrev based on the merge once the regression testing is complete.
-Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/caiman-discuss/attachments/20091204/4319cdde/attachment.html>
