Hi Sarah,

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Sarah Jelinek wrote:

> Hi Alok,
>
> Comments/questions below... I tried to to repeat what others have said, but 
> if I did, just tell me so...
>
> 1.2 Scope of the product:
>> * Primary target is server installations that don't want to set up AI
> This seems to indicate to me that the primary target for this is the text 
> based installer. Is this correct?

The text installer could be used in such a situation or
if a hands off installation is desired, the bootable AI
can be used. But, in general, I agree that there is a bit
of overlap between the two installers for above mentioned
target audience.

> Have we decided to combine the text 
> installer in with this image? If so, the text installer will be doing, if I 
> remember correctly, cpio installation. The first bullet in this section seems 
> to indicate that we will only do installation from an IPS network repo.

The text installer image will be a separate image and will
not be combined with the AI image. I believe that is captured
in the text installer func spec.

> nit:
> 3.1, should say "following three(not two) choices"

Got it.

> In the case of VMC, how will the three grub menu options work? I assume VMC 
> will modify the menu.lst file to only have one entry and that entry contains 
> the value for the manifest?

Correct.

>> The first choice will be the default if none is selected by
>> the user
>
> Where does the user specify the manifest for this choice? Or is this 
> pre-specified somehow? I assume this is default because we don't want to 
> automatically start AI in all cases. Which means that the user must specify 
> this somehow.

The user will be prompted to provide a location for the manifest
(path to, say, manifest on the flash drive or an http server).

Yeah, this is the default choice because we don't want to overwrite
a user's disk unless specified otherwise.

> Section 3.4:
>
> Don't we already perform the lookup of the manifest in a separate service? Or 
> is this a new thing? I am just wondering how it compares to what we do today.

In the current implementation, service discovery as well as invoking
the auto-install binary are done as part of the auto-installer service. 
In the past, we've talked about splitting up these two functional areas
into separate service (atleast in the context of derived manifests).

Alok

Alok

Reply via email to