Jack Schwartz wrote: > Hi Jean. > > Sounds reasonable to me, since the original flexibility is retained. > I would make sure the added attribute has a descriptive name. dup_ok > isn't descriptive enough. Something nearly as descriptive as > "save_in_pkg_image_area" but shorter. How about pkg_image_save? Great name. Thanks for the input.
Jean > > Thanks, > Jack > > On 02/10/09 14:18, Jean McCormack wrote: >> I'm working on 1041 which deals with the fact that some files exist >> in both the pkg_image area and the bootroot and don't need too. >> There are quite a few files where this is true and yet there are >> whole directories like /usr, /boot, /platform.. where this is not true. >> >> My thought is that in the future people may add to the bootroot >> contents and just screening out the files we know have to stay >> duplicated >> and removing the others could leave to problems. I'm suggesting >> adding another field to the bootroot_contents base_include to deal >> with this. >> It would be something like dup_ok = true or false. false would be the >> default value if someone doesn't specify. >> >> Any reasons not to? >> >> Jean >> >> _______________________________________________ >> caiman-discuss mailing list >> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >
