For those small sites, is having full page cache actually needed? I would guess that performance wouldn't be a big concern in those cases
On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:47:16 AM UTC+2, HK wrote: > > For small sites that I develop is very helpful. The need to > use/configure/monitor extra software like varnish is pain in the ass, > especially if you don't have big sites to host. > > On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:28:17 AM UTC+3, José Lorenzo wrote: >> >> HK why would you miss it? There will be no replacement for the cache >> helper. We recommend using Varnish, which provides the ESI tags. They are >> similar to the cache tags but they involve internally doing another >> request. We think this is a more robust and scalable solution than doing it >> in PHP. >> >> On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:06:36 AM UTC+2, HK wrote: >>> >>> Too sad to hear cache helper is removed. This ESI based replacement is >>> it going to be in stable 3.0 version? >>> >>> On Monday, July 28, 2014 10:13:14 AM UTC+3, José Lorenzo wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> CacheHelper has been removed from CakePHP. The core team feels that the >>>> functionality this helper provided is best handled by standalone servers >>>> like Varnish <http://varnish-cache.org/>. While we explored building a >>>> ESI based replacement for CacheHelper, there were a number of edge cases >>>> that would have complicated the implementation. >>>> >>> >>> >> -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
