On 2/6/07, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I definitely wasn't agreeing with you, but I wasn't really making fun > of you either. I'll give you a hint: there's a reason why we have a > base DataSource class, which is extended by DboSource, which talks to > the database on behalf of a model. Felix's Google Analytics model is > actually a pretty poor example. Not because Felix is a bad coder or > anything (quite the contrary), but because up till now, there are a > few things that people really haven't clearly understood (or perhaps, > there are a few things we haven't made clear for people). Basically > what I'm trying to say is that you should never have to extend Model > in that way. Models are designed to *model* data, not handle the > details of accessing it. >
Ah! *light bulb goes on over head* Now I understand. Thanks for clearing that up. -- Chris Hartjes My motto for 2007: "Just build it, damnit!" rallyhat.com - digitial photo scavenger hunt @TheBallpark - http://www.littlehart.net/attheballpark @TheKeyboard - http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---