And the problem with many selects occured probably because I've added those uses I guess I should not
On 12 Gru, 12:16, Zwift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your example used only hasOne associacion, but I want to have also > back associacion belongsTo > I just noticed that in bakers <-> brands example brands were not > grabbed in index() controller method, and thats because lack of > belongsTo i guess. > hasOne (which prints out associaced brand when I view single records) > works for me too, but problem persists when I try to have bakers and > their brands in findAll() > something like > array( > [0] => array([Baker] => array(), [Brand] => array()), > [1] => array([Baker] => array(), [Brand] => array()), > [2] => array([Baker] => array(), [Brand] => array()) > ) > > can you try to recreate this ?? > without other models > just bakers in one db, and brands in the other db > > I'm always using newest version from svn > > On 12 Gru, 11:26, grigri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sounds like a version issue to me, I remember a while ago queries were > > merged to use IN(...) rather than multiple separate ones. > > > I'm using the bleeding edge, I'm not sure what revision my playground > > was when I ran the tests (updated it this morning) but it was > > definitely after the pre-beta release. > > > Check trac for the correct revision and update your version, and you > > shouldn't have this issue. > > > On Dec 12, 10:16 am, Zwift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks. > > > After more investigation I found out that bake didn't add uses > > > LocalNumber to LocalAccounts Controller > > > However after I added this > > > It displays LocalAccounts for each existing LocalNumber... > > > Example > > > I have LocalNumbers 10001, 10002, 10003, 10004 > > > and only one LocalAccount with assigned number 10003 > > > > But it displays all of them (there is a SELECT query for each existing > > > LocalNumber), it looks more or less like this > > > id | user_id | localNumber > > > | | 10001 > > > | | 10002 > > > 1 | 1 | 10003 //this record exists > > > | | 10004 > > > > and this is done only when using associacion between two databases > > > (there is no problem in when both tables are in one because of JOIN I > > > guess) > > > can I prevent cake for doing this somehow ?? > > > > On 11 Gru, 14:54, grigri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I just copied a model across from another project and added the > > > > dbconfig to the config file under a different key. > > > > > Code + SQL here :http://openpaste.org/en/4255/ > > > > > (I always have a 'playground' cake app setup on my local machine for > > > > various testing and experimentation) > > > > > On Dec 11, 1:38 pm, Zwift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Can you paste here your SQL Dumb, and models code > > > > > > I just don't understand whats going on here? > > > > > > Or did you used my above example?? > > > > > > Hell... > > > > > Darkness... > > > > > > On 11 Gru, 14:11, grigri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I just ran a quick test (I've never actually needed to have more > > > > > > than > > > > > > one db config for the same app so far) and it works fine, even > > > > > > without > > > > > > the external bit. > > > > > > > It seems completely transparent, and it's only seeing the sql logs > > > > > > that you realise it does a separate query, not a join, for the > > > > > > external association. > > > > > > > On Dec 11, 12:35 pm, Zwift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > After some researching I just need to know - is it even > > > > > > > possible??? > > > > > > > Many people (on IRC) says: yes, sure > > > > > > > But hell I cannot make it work even with simples User <-> Profile > > > > > > > associacion (from tempdocs) > > > > > > > > On 11 Gru, 11:56, Zwift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think > > > > > > > > nothttp://api.cakephp.org/1.2/libs_2model_2model_8php-source.html(from > > > > > > > > line 260) > > > > > > > > > On 11 Gru, 11:44, grigri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If your models are using different datasources you have to > > > > > > > > > set the > > > > > > > > > 'external' attribute in the association (I think). > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 11, 9:28 am, Zwift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > 2 Models > > > > > > > > > > FIRST: > > > > > > > > > > > class LocalNumber extends AppModel { > > > > > > > > > > var $useDbConfig = 'prepaid'; > > > > > > > > > > var $useTable = 'cards'; > > > > > > > > > > var $primaryKey = 'number'; > > > > > > > > > > var $displayField = 'number'; > > > > > > > > > > var $name = 'LocalNumber'; > > > > > > > > > > var $recursive = 2; > > > > > > > > > > > var $hasOne = array( > > > > > > > > > > 'LocalAccount' => array( > > > > > > > > > > 'ClassName' => 'LocalAccount', > > > > > > > > > > 'foreignKey' => 'local_number_id' > > > > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > ); > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > SECOND: > > > > > > > > > > class LocalAccount extends AppModel { > > > > > > > > > > > var $name = 'LocalAccount'; > > > > > > > > > > > var $belongsTo = array( > > > > > > > > > > 'LocalNumber' => array('className' > > > > > > > > > > => 'LocalNumber', > > > > > > > > > > 'foreignKey' => > > > > > > > > > > 'local_number_id') > > > > > > > > > > ); > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > And I have no idea why its not working - LocalNumber just > > > > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > > > > appear in view (view and controller were baked). > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? Maybe I did something wrong?? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
