Nate wrote: > On Jun 21, 9:54 am, Ian Zepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I do agree, on principle, that non-actions should be written as >> protected or private methods. I'm was just pointing out the convention >> differences (from Zend) and potential pitfalls of the cake dispatcher model. >> > > Uh, no? Wrong? > > You must be on a "special" PHP distro, because every version in the > 5.x series that I've ever used throws a fatal error if you try to call > a private method from outside the class it's declared in. > > The only pitfalls in Cake's dispatcher are not paying attention, but > that's gonna be a pitfall in pretty much any area of life.
Yes, I realized that after I hit send. I was thinking of non-static being called statically (not non-public being called publically). > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
