This is true if your site is purely static then cake is a pretty hefty overhead, however.....
If you use view caching, coupled with a custom CacheHelper to render essentially static cached copies of your cake pages then you can still pull pretty good render times, your site is in a familiar format ( that is if you use cake a lot ) and hey, one day that site might require some more functionality... so of course your going to do it in cake! ;-) -----Original Message----- From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Miles J Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:53 AM To: CakePHP Subject: Re: How well I can use CakePHP for building static site ? If its all static, all you need is a header.php and a footer.php and include them on every page. Why use all the extra overhead and processing for static pages? No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1888 - Release Date: 1/12/2009 7:04 AM --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
