> On Feb 16, 2017, at 08:57, Pete Heist <petehe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [… discussion about DSCP to WMM classes mapping]
> This always makes me wonder what’s to keep someone from just marking all
> their traffic 0x7 and stomping over everyone else.
I have a gut feeling that an AP in a untrusted/hostile environment
should monitor the usage of the 4 different WMM classes and step up their class
accordingly. That is in an environment where there is a lot of AC_VO or AC_VI
traffic the AP should elevate its normal data packets priority to match as not
too be drowned out by the other senders. Sort of a reciprocal tit-for-tat
approach, with the goal that the AP will keep access to a decent share of
airtime. But since I am a layman in these matters, I might be out to lunch on
this…
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> Thanks,
> Pete
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
