On 10/10/2022, 11:09, "Sebastian Moeller" <moell...@gmx.de> wrote:
Nice!
> On Oct 10, 2022, at 07:52, Taraldsen Erik via Cake
<cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> It took about 3 hours from the video was release before we got the first
request to have SQM on the CPE's we manage as a ISP. Finally getting some
customer response on the issue.
[SM] Will you be able to bump these requests to higher-ups and at least
change some perception of customer demand for tighter latency performance?
That would be the hope. We actually have fq_codel implemented on the two
latest generations of DSL routers. Use sync rate as input to set the rate.
Works quite well.
There is also a bit of traction around speedtest.net's inclusion of latency
under load internally. My hope is that some publication in Norway will pick up
on that score and do a test and get some mainstream publicity with the results.
-Erik
_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
