Well my NIC has 4 queues as far as I can tell, so it could likely work, but as you say it’s like killing a mosquito with a gatling gun.
Those graphs are sweet though, and it’s been in my backlog for awhile to do something with Grafana to get something similar, like this one from a few years ago you’ve seen too: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/sqm-reporting/59960/96 Best Regards, Nils Andreas Svee > On Jan 9, 2024, at 18:17, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > Principal limitation for libreqos on a small box is has to have > multiple hardware queues and support eBPF. > > Seriously folks, running libreqos at home is *serious overkill*, > although I have to admit the traffic graphs are mesmerizing!!! One of > our ISPs has been setting them to music: > https://www.youtube.com/@trendaltoews7143 > > Herbert has been working on adding all sorts of other analytics to it also. > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 12:07 PM dave seddon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Nils - I guess you could run LibreQoS on N100? >> >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 8:57 AM Nils Andreas Svee via Cake >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 9, 2024, at 17:05, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:40 AM Nils Andreas Svee via Cake >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Though frankly, I don’t plan on updating the sch_cake and tc binaries when >>> new firmwares are released anymore, as they don’t publish the GPL archives >>> on their webpage after the redesign, and they don’t respond to requests for >>> them either by the looks of the forums. So if it breaks there’s not much I >>> can do anymore. >>> >>> >>> This irks me enormously. It is the direct outcome of the cambium >>> elevate lawsuit, where both companies lost, the ISPs lost, open source >>> practices long established about publishing sources, lost, and the >>> lawyers went on to other nasty things leaving this trail of awful >>> precedents in their wake. >>> >>> https://www.mtin.net/blog/ubnt-vs-cambium/ >>> >>> Wow, hadn’t read about that. They even sued an ISP just for using Cambium’s >>> software on their hardware? >>> That is crazy, just evil corporate lawyers doing their thing I guess. >>> >>> I do not know what to do about it. It also irks me that as a >>> contributor to "smart queues" they are not maintaining it well. >>> >>> It leaves something to be desired yes, and I would’ve hoped to see CAKE >>> included too of course, >>> but even WireGuard is only available in the latest release candidates with >>> the redesigned web UI, so I’m not holding my breath. >>> >>> I still have an EdgeRouter 4 that serves the family farm and one of the >>> 8-port switches under my desk, if only because I don’t wanna spend money on >>> replacing them, and they do serve their purpose. >>> >>> I’ve since moved though, and now live in an area that has FTTH, so I needed >>> something beefier to handle CAKE on a 750/750 subscription, because >>> obviously there’s still bloat even on that ;) >>> >>> One of those Chinese boxes with a N100 in it and OpenWrt on top works >>> wonders :) >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Nils Andreas Svee >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cake mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Dave Seddon >> +1 415 857 5102 > > > > -- > 40 years of net history, a couple songs: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E > Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
_______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
