Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact, but only a couple of the tests are failing in that. The round trip (heavy) test that saves, searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So.. Not sure.
On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's what most people have. I >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us to release, IMO. Why did it >jump up like that? > >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework commit on Android. 21 >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus. >> >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good to go, Jesse says the same >>for >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good. >> >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs with a 1.6.0 directory, then >> tag the docs. >> >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >We have not committed anything new in cordova-js, we are just picking a >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming all of us have been working >>with >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms, we are not introducing anything >> >new. >> > >> >Every time any cordova developer touches the common code in cordova-js >> >that dev should be testing across all platforms. We have to stop >>working >> >in our little native silos; that is not in the spirit of this project. >>We >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of us need to be comfortable testing >>on >> >all supported platforms. >> > >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes somehow break Android, what happens? >> >> >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jesse MacFadyen >> >><[email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> >>> None. >> >>> Is none the new +1? >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Jesse >> >>> >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5 >> >>> >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > None >> >>> > >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <[email protected]>: >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it 1.6.0.. Objections? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Are you going to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3? >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> .... Already notes in docs. Durrr. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Tag? >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ actually Compass is not available in BlackBerry before >> >>>7.0.. So >> >>> >>>> that >> >>> >>>>> would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :) >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to update the docs to note this, and then, we >>should be >> >>> good >> >>> >>>> to >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya? >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> 37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The accel callback >>test >> >>> >>>> failed >> >>> >>>>>> but when I run the manual tests for accel they all check >>out, so >> >>>the >> >>> >>>> 37 >> >>> >>>>>> failing tests might be a little blown up. >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> The file API looks fine, Drew. >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed. The manual >>tests >> >>>for >> >>> >>>>>> Compass keep returning "[object object]" so there seems to >>be a >> >>> little >> >>> >>>>>> mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are looking into that. >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to tag. We >>pass >> >>>on >> >>> >>>> both a >> >>> >>>>>> 9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0). >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> No worries Jesse. >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to reproduce + >>fix >> >>>what >> >>> >>>>>>> you're >> >>> >>>>>>> seeing, Drew. >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" >> >>><[email protected]> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my rush to have a >> >>>long >> >>> >>>>>>>> weekend. >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sorry all. >> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jesse >> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone5 >> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> >> >>>wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android. I'll put it back >>when >> >>>we >> >>> >>>> get >> >>> >>>>>>>>> this >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sorted out! >> >>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of BB. Seeing some >>odd >> >>> >>>> behavior >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6. Not sure if it is >>my >> >>>test >> >>> >>>> app >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> real bug. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian LeRoux >><[email protected]> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from cordova-js and >> >>> integrated >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests failing. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest in 1.7. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just have to >> >>> >>>> remove/retag >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0 >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> IMO >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag reset >> >>>discussion? >> >>> >>>> with >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I think >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj >> >>><[email protected]> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the latest BB code so >> >>>I'll >> >>> let >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> guys >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before we're all good to >> >>>tag >> >>> >>>> this >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> release? >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald" >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the 1.6.0 tags. We >> >>>haven't >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there shouldn't be a >> >>>problem >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> that. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip Maj < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe lays out. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged cordova.js >> >>>file is >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> prone >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the manual process of >> >>>checking >> >>> >>>> out >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tag in >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copying the file over to >> >>>the >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the concern then >> >>>certainly, >> >>> the >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that automatically. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js was added >>4 >> >>>days >> >>> >>>> ago, >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2 >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what happened >>there. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being ordered properly >>and >> >>>the >> >>> >>>> file >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> bug >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for the 1.6.0 >>release, >> >>>that >> >>> >>>> we: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the latest commit >>(that >> >>> >>>> includes >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are at least in the >> >>>right >> >>> >>>> order >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the platform >>implementations >> >>> 1.6.0 >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then f it, I say we tag >> >>> >>>> everything >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 1.6.1. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis" >> >>> >>>> <[email protected]> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js into the >> >>>various >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the release. It is also >>error >> >>> >>>> prone - >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each repository every time >>there >> >>>is a >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> takes >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get out of of sync. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the release build script >> >>>handle >> >>> >>>> this? >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> far >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development and testing, we are >>all >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep current in our own >>ways. >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon MacDonald >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems to be a zero day bug in >>our >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> implementation >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible it would be good to get >> >>>this >> >>> bug >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> into >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>
