I'm getting the same thing on Gingerbread. The thing is that on my Galaxy Nexus running 4.0.2, I'm only getting 13 failures.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks like ICS is having issues with saving a contact, but only a couple > of the tests are failing in that. The round trip (heavy) test that saves, > searches, removes, then searches again passes.. So.. Not sure. > > On 4/10/12 11:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I'm still testing Android 2.3.6, because that's what most people have. I > >do think that 21 tests is rather high for us to release, IMO. Why did it > >jump up like that? > > > >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> All manual tests pass with latest js + framework commit on Android. 21 > >> failed Qunit tests. 4.0.2 Galaxy Nexus. > >> > >> From what I can tell Shaz says iOS is good to go, Jesse says the same > >>for > >> WP7. I know BB and Android are good. > >> > >> I'm going to tag the JS and update the docs with a 1.6.0 directory, then > >> tag the docs. > >> > >> On 4/10/12 11:23 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >We have not committed anything new in cordova-js, we are just picking a > >> >new commit to tag to 1.6.0, so assuming all of us have been working > >>with > >> >the cordova-js master in our platforms, we are not introducing anything > >> >new. > >> > > >> >Every time any cordova developer touches the common code in cordova-js > >> >that dev should be testing across all platforms. We have to stop > >>working > >> >in our little native silos; that is not in the spirit of this project. > >>We > >> >write a cross-platform tool, any of us need to be comfortable testing > >>on > >> >all supported platforms. > >> > > >> >On 4/10/12 11:05 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >>Sounds good. But if the changes somehow break Android, what happens? > >> >> > >> >>On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jesse MacFadyen > >> >><[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> None. > >> >>> Is none the new +1? > >> >>> > >> >>> Cheers, > >> >>> Jesse > >> >>> > >> >>> Sent from my iPhone5 > >> >>> > >> >>> On 2012-04-10, at 11:00 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > None > >> >>> > > >> >>> > 2012/4/10 Filip Maj <[email protected]>: > >> >>> >> I was gonna tag it 1.6.0.. Objections? > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> On 4/10/12 10:50 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> Are you going to tag it 1.6.0? or 1.6.0rc3? > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>>> .... Already notes in docs. Durrr. > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> Tag? > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> On 4/10/12 10:48 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>>> AhhhŠ actually Compass is not available in BlackBerry before > >> >>>7.0.. So > >> >>> >>>> that > >> >>> >>>>> would explain why it's not working on 6.0 :) > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to file an issue for that in JIRA. > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> I'm going to update the docs to note this, and then, we > >>should be > >> >>> good > >> >>> >>>> to > >> >>> >>>>> tag, ya? > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> On 4/10/12 10:44 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> 37 failing tests on a Torch running 6.0. The accel callback > >>test > >> >>> >>>> failed > >> >>> >>>>>> but when I run the manual tests for accel they all check > >>out, so > >> >>>the > >> >>> >>>> 37 > >> >>> >>>>>> failing tests might be a little blown up. > >> >>> >>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> The file API looks fine, Drew. > >> >>> >>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> Looks to me like Compass may be a little f'ed. The manual > >>tests > >> >>>for > >> >>> >>>>>> Compass keep returning "[object object]" so there seems to > >>be a > >> >>> little > >> >>> >>>>>> mistake in there somewhere. Gord and I are looking into that. > >> >>> >>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> If we resolve the compass issue IMO we're good to tag. We > >>pass > >> >>>on > >> >>> >>>> both a > >> >>> >>>>>> 9900 (runs 7.0) and a Torch (runs 6.0). > >> >>> >>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:31 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>> No worries Jesse. > >> >>> >>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>> I got my hands on an OS6 device so I'll try to reproduce + > >>fix > >> >>>what > >> >>> >>>>>>> you're > >> >>> >>>>>>> seeing, Drew. > >> >>> >>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse MacFadyen" > >> >>><[email protected]> > >> >>> >>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>> I was the over anxious js 1.6 tagger, in my rush to have a > >> >>>long > >> >>> >>>>>>>> weekend. > >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sorry all. > >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >> >>> >>>>>>>> Jesse > >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone5 > >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-04-10, at 9:50 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> > >> >>>wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>> I deleted the 1.6.0 tag from Android. I'll put it back > >>when > >> >>>we > >> >>> >>>> get > >> >>> >>>>>>>>> this > >> >>> >>>>>>>>> sorted out! > >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Drew Walters < > >> >>> [email protected]> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still testing on other versions of BB. Seeing some > >>odd > >> >>> >>>> behavior > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> all of a sudden in File API on OS 6. Not sure if it is > >>my > >> >>>test > >> >>> >>>> app > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> or > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> real bug. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Brian LeRoux > >><[email protected]> > >> >>> >>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012, Filip Maj wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK so I pulled the latest master from cordova-js and > >> >>> integrated > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> latest master for blackberry-webworks. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tested on the 9900, looks good. 18 tests failing. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tag it - ship it. Let's iron out the rest in 1.7. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:59 AM, "Filip Maj" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with leaving the RC tags alone. Just have to > >> >>> >>>> remove/retag > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0 > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> IMO > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:54 AM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait until BB is done and do a tag reset > >> >>>discussion? > >> >>> >>>> with > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc1 should still be there though I think > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj > >> >>><[email protected]> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of testing the latest BB code so > >> >>>I'll > >> >>> let > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> guys > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon how we're looking there. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that the last thing need before we're all good to > >> >>>tag > >> >>> >>>> this > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> release? > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 8:30 AM, "Simon MacDonald" > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should delete all the 1.6.0 tags. We > >> >>>haven't > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build artifacts from 1.6.0 so there shouldn't be a > >> >>>problem > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> that. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I agree with Fil's steps. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Filip Maj < > >> >>> [email protected]> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like the general process Joe lays out. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how vendoring-in a tagged cordova.js > >> >>>file is > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> prone > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though, Bryce. Is it just the manual process of > >> >>>checking > >> >>> >>>> out > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> tag in > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-js, building, and copying the file over to > >> >>>the > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation? If this is the concern then > >> >>>certainly, > >> >>> the > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tool > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be set up to do that automatically. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js was added > >>4 > >> >>>days > >> >>> >>>> ago, > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6.0rc2 > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was added ~ 1 day ago. Not sure what happened > >>there. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In light of the tags not being ordered properly > >>and > >> >>>the > >> >>> >>>> file > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> bug > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creeping in, I propose, just for the 1.6.0 > >>release, > >> >>>that > >> >>> >>>> we: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Delete the old 1.6.0 tag in cordova-js. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Retag cordova-js 1.6.0 to the latest commit > >>(that > >> >>> >>>> includes > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seek bug fix) - now our tags are at least in the > >> >>>right > >> >>> >>>> order > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) rebuild, reintegrate into platforms > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) unfortunately, retag the platform > >>implementations > >> >>> 1.6.0 > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If retagging is too unholy then f it, I say we tag > >> >>> >>>> everything > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> 1.6.1. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/12 7:19 AM, "Bryce Curtis" > >> >>> >>>> <[email protected]> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Joe eluded to, checking cordova-js into the > >> >>>various > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories holds up the release. It is also > >>error > >> >>> >>>> prone - > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> to > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mention pushing to each repository every time > >>there > >> >>>is a > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> takes > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time & can get out of of sync. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts on having the release build script > >> >>>handle > >> >>> >>>> this? > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> far > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as during normal development and testing, we are > >>all > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordova.js anyway, and keep current in our own > >>ways. > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon MacDonald > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just fixed what seems to be a zero day bug in > >>our > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> implementation > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileWriter. If possible it would be good to get > >> >>>this > >> >>> bug > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> into > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> platform > >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>>> > >> >>> >>>>> > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > >> > > >> > >> > >
