Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA too. Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in two hours haha
On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote: >Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE >files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed >all the bugs I saw. > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Android is tagged. >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Done >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that. >> > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any >> > > > complaints. >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag >> > > > > >> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and >>tag >> > JS >> > > > > >> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js >> > coming, >> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1 >> > > > > > >> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel* >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser >><[email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the >> > history. >> > > > We >> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since that >> > would >> > > be >> > > > > >>>more >> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't do >> this >> > > next >> > > > > >>> time". I'm not that invested in it. >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow), it >> > should >> > > be >> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as >>1.6.0. >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the >> common >> > js >> > > > > >>>>API, and >> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one thing >>out >> > for >> > > > > >>>>1.7? >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the impression >> that >> > > iOS >> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused. >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1? >> Although >> > > > > >>>>nothing >> > > > > >>>> that >> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie, >>all >> in >> > > my >> > > > > >>>> platform >> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder ) >> > > > > >>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early >> > anyways.. >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron >><[email protected] >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted (it >> > > exists), I >> > > > > >>>>will >> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I >>acknowledge >> my >> > > > > >>>>mistake in >> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off >>1.6.0 >> > then >> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1? >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > > > >>>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in >>the >> > > common >> > > > > >>>>JS, >> > > > > >>>> even >> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there. >> > > > > >>>> >>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > > >>>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser < >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and >> get >> > > this >> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling? >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > > > >>>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like >>allow >> > edit >> > > > and >> > > > > >>>>those >> > > > > >>>> >>> ones) >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left >>them >> in >> > > > there >> > > > > >>>>as we >> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without >>needing >> an >> > > API >> > > > > >>>> >>>extension: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs >>need to >> > > > > >>>>updated too. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long >>and >> > > > > >>>>difficult >> > > > > >>>> >>>process >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every platform >>we >> > add >> > > > > >>>>support >> > > > > >>>> >>>to. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS >> > parameters >> > > > > >>>>ones >> > > > > >>>> that >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't >>know >> > how >> > > we >> > > > > >>>>merge >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking >>those >> out >> > > > will >> > > > > >>>>break >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is >>the >> > way >> > > > to >> > > > > >>>>go as >> > > > > >>>> >>>per >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . >> > We >> > > > can >> > > > > >>>> remove >> > > > > >>>> >>> this >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in >> > somehow. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser >> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't >>belong >> > in >> > > > the >> > > > > >>>> common >> > > > > >>>> >>> API. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole >>point >> of >> > > > > >>>>cordova-js >> > > > > >>>> >>>is >> > > > > >>>> >>> so >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to >>add >> > this >> > > > to >> > > > > >>>>the >> > > > > >>>> >>>docs, >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron >> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj >> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" < >> > [email protected]> >> > > > > >>>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the >>cordova-js? I >> > can >> > > > > >>>>branch >> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 >> > > > > >>>> >>> and >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj >> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs >>for >> > this. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" < >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like >> it's >> > > > > >>>>intended >> > > > > >>>> >>>for >> > > > > >>>> >>> both >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be >>in >> > > 1.6.1. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip >>Maj < >> > > > > >>>> [email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that >> myself. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. >>sigh. >> > We >> > > > > >>>>gotta >> > > > > >>>> stop >> > > > > >>>> >>> doing >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that, >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update >> documentation. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" >> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param >> for >> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet? I >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip >> Maj >> > > > > >>>> >>><[email protected] >> > > > > >>>> >>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in >>the >> > JS >> > > > > >>>>should >> > > > > >>>> >>>work >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake >> > tasks >> > > in >> > > > > >>>>the >> > > > > >>>> >>>future >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th >> "async" >> > > > > >>>>parameter >> > > > > >>>> to >> > > > > >>>> >>> the >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task() >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call >>complete() >> > > when >> > > > > >>>>the >> > > > > >>>> >>>task is >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See >> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" >> > > > > >>>><[email protected] >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is >>tagged >> > > > 1.6.1. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, >>Anis >> > > KADRI >> > > > < >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> [email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 >> > before >> > > > > >>>>end of >> > > > > >>>> >>>day >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, >> > Shazron >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version >>tag >> > as >> > > > > >>>>well in >> > > > > >>>> >>> jira... >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 >>PM, >> > > Shazron >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was >> > > released, >> > > > > >>>>I'm >> > > > > >>>> >>>going >> > > > > >>>> >>> to >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release" >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and >>move >> > > > > >>>>outstanding >> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0 >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 >>PM, >> > > Filip >> > > > > >>>>Maj >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. >> Since >> > > > > >>>>adding the >> > > > > >>>> >>> commit >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default >> task >> > > > isn't >> > > > > >>>> >>>running >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake >> build" >> > > and >> > > > > >>>>"jake >> > > > > >>>> >>> test" >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it >> out. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, >>"Shazron" < >> > > > > >>>> >>> [email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS >> has a >> > > few >> > > > > >>>> commits >> > > > > >>>> >>> (one >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for >> > first >> > > > > >>>>thing >> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 >> PM, >> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><[email protected]> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been >>discovered >> in >> > > > > >>>>Cordova >> > > > > >>>> >>> Android >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out >> the >> > > bug >> > > > > >>>>on the >> > > > > >>>> >>> issue >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to >>just >> > > > > >>>>repackage >> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know >>if >> > > people >> > > > > >>>>are >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also >>had >> > some >> > > > > >>>>major >> > > > > >>>> >>>issues >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 >> release. >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
