https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-496
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > Sigh - user reported iOS bug > http://groups.google.com/group/phonegap/browse_thread/thread/faad0af97dec8907 > (you know who you are ;) > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> Saweet! Nice work Anis. That kills off a bunch of old issues in JIRA too. >> >> Way to hunker down all. As Jesse pointed out to me, we did 45 emails in >> two hours haha >> >> On 4/12/12 5:00 PM, "Anis KADRI" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>Bada 1.2 is tagged 1.6.1. I added the new Cordova artwork, LICENSE/NOTICE >>>files as well as the Apache source headers in every source file. I fixed >>>all the bugs I sawS >>> >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Android is tagged. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Done >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > I'd like to get the JS from the tag, but I need a tag for that. >>>> > > >>>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jesse <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > Okay, I think it's good, tagging at 16:32 PDT if i don't hear any >>>> > > > complaints. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > I just axed the existing 1.6.1 cordova-js tag >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Jesse when you feel you've got everything in there go ahead and >>>>tag >>>> > JS >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > On 4/12/12 4:20 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >Reverted. Just talked to Jesse - he has commits to cordova-js >>>> > coming, >>>> > > > > >once those are in we can re-tag cordova-js to 1.6.1 >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >> I'll remove it. *grabs the shovel* >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Joe Bowser >>>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>> You know, let's not rebase it, because it does modify the >>>> > history. >>>> > > > We >>>> > > > > >>> should remove and document why we did it instead, since that >>>> > would >>>> > > be >>>> > > > > >>>more >>>> > > > > >>> transparent. Or we could just leave it in and say "don't do >>>> this >>>> > > next >>>> > > > > >>> time". I'm not that invested in it. >>>> > > > > >>> >>>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> If we take out that iOS commit in cordova-js (somehow), it >>>> > should >>>> > > be >>>> > > > > >>>> fine. cordova-ios 1.6.1 will then just be the same as >>>>1.6.0. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the >>>> common >>>> > js >>>> > > > > >>>>API, and >>>> > > > > >>>> >>reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one thing >>>>out >>>> > for >>>> > > > > >>>>1.7? >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > That sounds very good to me but I am under the impression >>>> that >>>> > > iOS >>>> > > > > >>>> > requires this commit? Like I said I'm quite confused. >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1? >>>> Although >>>> > > > > >>>>nothing >>>> > > > > >>>> that >>>> > > > > >>>> >>modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie, >>>>all >>>> in >>>> > > my >>>> > > > > >>>> platform >>>> > > > > >>>> >>specific plugins folder ) >>>> > > > > >>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > O then it sounds like I tagged the JS 1.6.1 too early >>>> > anyways.. >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron >>>><[email protected] >>>> > >>>> > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted (it >>>> > > exists), I >>>> > > > > >>>>will >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I >>>>acknowledge >>>> my >>>> > > > > >>>>mistake in >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off >>>>1.6.0 >>>> > then >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1? >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser < >>>> > > [email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in >>>>the >>>> > > common >>>> > > > > >>>>JS, >>>> > > > > >>>> even >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > though it's not supposed to be there. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron < >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser < >>>> > > > [email protected] >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and >>>> get >>>> > > this >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>rolling? >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj < >>>> > > [email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like >>>>allow >>>> > edit >>>> > > > and >>>> > > > > >>>>those >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> ones) >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left >>>>them >>>> in >>>> > > > there >>>> > > > > >>>>as we >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> didn't >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> want to remove without deprecation. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without >>>>needing >>>> an >>>> > > API >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>extension: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> then >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs >>>>need to >>>> > > > > >>>>updated too. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long >>>>and >>>> > > > > >>>>difficult >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>process >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every platform >>>>we >>>> > add >>>> > > > > >>>>support >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>to. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS >>>> > parameters >>>> > > > > >>>>ones >>>> > > > > >>>> that >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't >>>>know >>>> > how >>>> > > we >>>> > > > > >>>>merge >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking >>>>those >>>> out >>>> > > > will >>>> > > > > >>>>break >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is >>>>the >>>> > way >>>> > > > to >>>> > > > > >>>>go as >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>per >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>>>http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . >>>> > We >>>> > > > can >>>> > > > > >>>> remove >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> this >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in >>>> > somehow. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't >>>>belong >>>> > in >>>> > > > the >>>> > > > > >>>> common >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> API. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>It'd >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole >>>>point >>>> of >>>> > > > > >>>>cordova-js >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>is >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> so >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> it's common. It'd look pretty screwed up to >>>>add >>>> > this >>>> > > > to >>>> > > > > >>>>the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>docs, >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> IMO. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter? >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" < >>>> > [email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the >>>>cordova-js? I >>>> > can >>>> > > > > >>>>branch >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> and >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1 >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs >>>>for >>>> > this. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment? >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" < >>>> > > > [email protected] >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like >>>> it's >>>> > > > > >>>>intended >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>for >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> both >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> Android >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be >>>>in >>>> > > 1.6.1. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip >>>>Maj < >>>> > > > > >>>> [email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that >>>> myself. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param.. >>>>sigh. >>>> > We >>>> > > > > >>>>gotta >>>> > > > > >>>> stop >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> doing >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>that, >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update >>>> documentation. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param >>>> for >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Camera.getPicture >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>yet? I >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip >>>> Maj >>>> > > > > >>>> >>><[email protected] >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in >>>>the >>>> > JS >>>> > > > > >>>>should >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>work >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>now. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake >>>> > tasks >>>> > > in >>>> > > > > >>>>the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>future >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> and >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>make >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>them >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th >>>> "async" >>>> > > > > >>>>parameter >>>> > > > > >>>> to >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>task() >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call >>>>complete() >>>> > > when >>>> > > > > >>>>the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>task is >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> done. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>an >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> example. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" >>>> > > > > >>>><[email protected] >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is >>>>tagged >>>> > > > 1.6.1. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, >>>>Anis >>>> > > KADRI >>>> > > > < >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> [email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 >>>> > before >>>> > > > > >>>>end of >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>day >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> today >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>after >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>some >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, >>>> > Shazron >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version >>>>tag >>>> > as >>>> > > > > >>>>well in >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> jira... >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 >>>>PM, >>>> > > Shazron >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was >>>> > > released, >>>> > > > > >>>>I'm >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>going >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> to >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release" >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and >>>>move >>>> > > > > >>>>outstanding >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issues to >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>1.7.0 >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 >>>>PM, >>>> > > Filip >>>> > > > > >>>>Maj >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. >>>> Since >>>> > > > > >>>>adding the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> commit >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> ID >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>into >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default >>>> task >>>> > > > isn't >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>running >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>properly. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake >>>> build" >>>> > > and >>>> > > > > >>>>"jake >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> test" >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> but >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>not >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it >>>> out. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, >>>>"Shazron" < >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> [email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging. iOS >>>> has a >>>> > > few >>>> > > > > >>>> commits >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> (one >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>commit >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>in >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for >>>> > first >>>> > > > > >>>>thing >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> tomorrow >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> for >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>you >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>to >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage? >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 >>>> PM, >>>> > > > > >>>>Steven Gill >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><[email protected]> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been >>>>discovered >>>> in >>>> > > > > >>>>Cordova >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> Android >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> that >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out >>>> the >>>> > > bug >>>> > > > > >>>>on the >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> issue >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>tracker >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>at >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809# >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>co >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809 >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to >>>>just >>>> > > > > >>>>repackage >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>1.6.0 >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> with >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know >>>>if >>>> > > people >>>> > > > > >>>>are >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> experiencing >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>this >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>or >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also >>>>had >>>> > some >>>> > > > > >>>>major >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>issues >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>which he >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>has >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 >>>> release. >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts? >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >> >>>> > > > > >>>> >>> >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>
