Makes sense - I'm fine with rename for 2.0. We may want to introduce "cordova" into 1.9 and keep "ctx" with deprecation notice. Also, make sure it's documented. This will break plug-ins when removed.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > Yeh "ctx" implies Context, especially for Android peoples, so +1 to > renaming to something less Android-ey. > > On 6/18/12 11:45 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hey >> >>Since we're approaching 2.0 and since part of the goals of 2.0 is to >>improve the plugin architecture, I'm wondering if we should take the >>opportunity to give the CordovaInterface variable on Plugin.java a name >>other than ctx, which on Android usually refers to a context. The reason >>for this is the fact that there's a use case where the CordovaInterface >>may >>not be a Context. I propose that we change the name to cordova. >> >>I'm not sure if this needs a JIRA ticket or not. >> >>Any thoughts? >> >>Joe >
