Yeah, the "ctx" name does not make sense anymore. +1 to the rename.
Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > Makes sense - I'm fine with rename for 2.0. We may want to introduce > "cordova" into 1.9 and keep "ctx" with deprecation notice. Also, make > sure it's documented. This will break plug-ins when removed. > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> Yeh "ctx" implies Context, especially for Android peoples, so +1 to >> renaming to something less Android-ey. >> >> On 6/18/12 11:45 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Hey >>> >>>Since we're approaching 2.0 and since part of the goals of 2.0 is to >>>improve the plugin architecture, I'm wondering if we should take the >>>opportunity to give the CordovaInterface variable on Plugin.java a name >>>other than ctx, which on Android usually refers to a context. The reason >>>for this is the fact that there's a use case where the CordovaInterface >>>may >>>not be a Context. I propose that we change the name to cordova. >>> >>>I'm not sure if this needs a JIRA ticket or not. >>> >>>Any thoughts? >>> >>>Joe >>
