Could we possibly use base64 encoding for images, and inline them? It would take up 30% more space but it means you can inline them in the html rather than having to package seperate resources?
-Mike On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > An icon is one thing, but we're going to have to start shipping UI > elements, which makes things more brittle. I'm wondering if anyone > has any way of making this less brittle or if we're going to just have > to drop the resources in the /res directory, use our typical mapping > and hope for the best. > > Investigating zoom. It look like we're going to need some mocks done > up on this end, so I'll have to figure that out. > > Joe > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > Don't understand the issue Joe? We already ship a default icon drawable > > resource - what's the issue with more? > > > > On 9/25/12 1:03 PM, "Mike Reinstein" <reinstein.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>If someday we were to package the camera plugin as we plan to with 3rd > >>party plugins, we could easily add assets. Several plugins already do > >>this. > >> > >> > >> > >>On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hey > >>> > >>> So, while doing the UI for the Camera, I just realized that we're > >>> going to have to distribute images with Cordova. I can see this being > >>> an issue with any plugin that does UI. Does anyone have any idea how > >>> to solve this issue? > >>> > >>> Joe > >>> > > >
