It's a great dance, and I've generally not seen problems with the "face
   back in" and "face the next" california twirls (though I have a couple
   of times had people try to balance before the swing, only to discover
   that they didn't have time for the swing.  The balance, roll away,
   balance, california twirl sequence feels really good, so I would,
   personally, hesitate to take it out.  If you do try different versions,
   though, let us know how it goes.  Whenever I've called it, I've had
   people come up and comment about what a great dance it is (and callers
   asking for a copy).
   Jack
   At 12:19 PM 9/1/2009, you wrote:

     Hi Janet,
     That's a neat dance that I'd like to try. I would think the way it's
     written
     (swinging your *next* neighbor) works best since the CA Twirl makes
     you
     change the direction your facing. But since dancers have turned to
     face back
     in the opposite directiona fter the previous two CA Twirls, it may
     be tough
     to "switch modes" and do a regular CA Twirl. I'd have to dance it to
     see
     what that feels like...
     Anyway, if you changed the dance to "swing your current neighbor",
     you'd
     lose a progression. You could then swap in the "2x progression" B2
     option
     you suggested (no roll away) and it would make a regular single
     progression
     dance. Hmm...now I want to try it!
     Thanks for sharing!
     -Sargon
     ------------------------------
     Message: 6
     Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:24:31 -0400
     From: Janet Levatin <jleva...@massmed.org>
     To: Caller's discussion list <call...@sharedweight.net>
     Subject: Re: [Callers] California Twirlin' author
     Message-ID: <e5186d70-4924-49ac-85ed-757ae9a86...@massmed.org>
     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
     Bill,
     Thanks for letting me know the square dancing terminology. When I
     wrote the dance I was trying to think of a move (or a variation on a
     move) that I didn't see used in contra dancing, at least not in
     dances
     I had done.
     I think the swing in A2 is fine as the dancers are facing a new
     neighbor and have plenty of time for the swing. Someone, like Seth,
     who has called the dance a lot may have more feedback on that. If I
     remember correctly, I think when he first called it he had the
     dancers
     swing their current neighbor instead of their new neighbors. I'm not
     sure how that would work.
     Janet
     On Sep 1, 2009, at 6:06 AM, Liz and Bill wrote:
     > Hi Janet,
     >
     >    An interesting use of California twirl. Looks like a neat
     dance.
     > I'm getting a lot of square dancers
     > at my contra dances in New Zealand. In MWSD terminology
     "California
     > twirl and face back in"  is
     > "California twirl and roll".  How do women find the swing coming
     out
     > of the California twirl in A2?
     >
     > Cheers, Bill
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > Callers mailing list
     > call...@sharedweight.net
     > [1]http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
     >
     _______________________________________________
     Callers mailing list
     call...@sharedweight.net
     [2]http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

References

   1. http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
   2. http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Reply via email to