Oh, yes, I remember that rule. If I was asked by someone I really didn’t want 
to dance with, and I declined to dance with them, I would sit out the next 
dance in order not to hurt their feelings and I had to act as if I was tired or 
I wanted to sit it out, all the time wishing that I'd avoided that particular 
person and could be dancing. I suppose the idea was more not to be cliquish, 
and only dance with the few people you knew, leaving newcomers unwelcome and 
feeling left out. But I wasn’t very picky - I danced with pretty much everyone 
except one or two people who were either too interested in me, or just such bad 
dancers that I could get hurt. I do think it’s a good idea to not be limited by 
having to sit out if you turned someone down. But perhaps people should be 
reminded that they might meet a new friend if they dance with someone they 
don’t know. And experienced dancers could be encouraged to dance with less 
experienced dancers to help improve the overall level of competence at the 
dance. Some places have really suffered by having experienced dancers that have 
frozen out new people so long that now their dance numbers are dwindling.

Martha

> On Dec 16, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Kalia Kliban via Callers 
> <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Those of us who started dancing 2 or 3 decades back probably remember the 
> rule about sitting out the dance if you turn down a partner offer. A very 
> competent male dancer I know who started around the same time I did (late 
> 80s) recently confessed to me that he never asks anyone to dance because he 
> doesn't want to put folks in the position of thinking "If I don't dance with 
> this guy then I have to sit one out.  Oh crap, guess I'll have to dance with 
> him."  For the record, he's a totally solid and delightful dancer.
> 
> To what extent has that earlier etiquette norm either survived or been 
> replaced, and what has it been replaced with?  In your dance community, do 
> you have a written statement of the etiquette around this?  Our community's 
> statement doesn't directly address this issue.
> 
> Kalia
> _______________________________________________
> List Name:  Callers mailing list
> List Address:  Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
> Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/

_______________________________________________
List Name:  Callers mailing list
List Address:  Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/

Reply via email to