Hi all,
I think that particular video is a poor example of what forearm turns can be.  
I can’t deny the potential for sweat, but, confession, my hands sweat like 
crazy anyway, and I seem to collect plenty of other people’s sweat in swings 
and courtesy turns, as it is. 
I disagree about weight.  The difference is that the connection puts less 
stress on joints and therefore feels lighter, but is, in fact, tighter.  At 
contra dances, doing a traditional allemande, where according to Rich we should 
find it easy to give weight, instead there’s a panoply of styles of mangling 
hands wrists and shoulders, flexing or flopping elbows, which result in all too 
few actually satisfying and well weighted allemandes, regardless of role 
danced.  If it were easy for that allemande to be well executed and well 
weighted, wouldn’t it more generally be so?  Wouldn’t there be fewer defensive 
variants?  
The forearm turn is almost impossible to mess up, with fewer joints involved, 
and even when less weight is applied, is firm and close enough to result in 
timely movement.  Whatever else can be said about it, it does not permit wide 
spacing between bodies, and people do automatically bend their elbows to 
something like the appropriate angle.  There only being one angle to adjust 
makes it easier to fine tune, in my opinion.
Richard Fisher requested, I think, a description.  To be as accurate as 
possible I asked my partner, who, like me, has been a long time contra and 
English dancer, as well as a MWSD dancer.  (I have always danced at gay clubs, 
which, I understand may be zestier than average?, and he is a  MIT Tech squares 
alum, which, being a college club, may also dance with higher energy than the 
club in the video) to simply give me a MWSD forearm as if we were about to, for 
example, swing thru.  He gave me what I expected, and what I consider good 
form: full hand and fingers solidly on the meaty inside of my forearm, which 
let me do the same, forming a flat wristed, full hand through forearm 
connection for both of us.  Instead of a W, you get more like a \__/ look. The 
outsides of the fingers are to a wall, the insides pushing at the forearm, like 
we pressure the hand in a traditional hold. It feels more like the whole arm is 
involved to me, less muscle action needed, only enough to maintain the arm 
position. We varied in how we held our digits, I had mine more open, he kept 
his flat, either way it functions like a mitt.  Both of us used our palms to 
make the primary connection, fingers lighter.  As in any allemande, the elbow 
and shoulder firm up to complete the connection.  It can be very zippy indeed!  
I’m still searching for a clear example in video form.  I’ll let you all know 
if I find one from sources I have access to.

FWIW, I am exhausted from the last few years of the community arguing about 
words and terms.  So I’m leery of us picking yet another thing to get exercised 
over.  If anyone truly gets near perfect results from their teach of a trad 
allemande, I will adopt their words on the spot.  Otherwise I’ll continue to 
see the leas than desirable quality of allemandes experienced as a pitfall of 
the hold itself combined with the usual humans being human, each with 
individual understandings, abilities, etc leading to highly variable execution, 
rather than a consequence of sub par teaching.
Peace everyone.
Andrea

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 21, 2019, at 1:50 AM, Erik Hoffman via Callers 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yes, sweaty men’s arms? IckQ! Sweaty women’s arms? Glowing!
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: Callers <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Rich 
> Sbardella via Callers
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 5:34 PM
> To: Don Veino <[email protected]>
> Cc: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Hand Turns & Safety
>  
> Don, 
> That is why Gents wear long sleeves all year in MWSD.
> No skin too skin.
> Rich
>  
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:19 PM Don Veino via Callers 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not to mention a lot less sweaty skin contact!
> _______________________________________________
> List Name:  Callers mailing list
> List Address:  [email protected]
> Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> _______________________________________________
> List Name:  Callers mailing list
> List Address:  [email protected]
> Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
_______________________________________________
List Name:  Callers mailing list
List Address:  [email protected]
Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to