Hi

On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:25:18PM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Hello all- **
> 
> A few weeks ago (maybe more) another user posted an inquiry about the 
> status of Callweaver development and the project as a whole. 
> Unfortunately, I don't believe there were any replies of substance to 
> the question. So, I'd like to pose the same inquiry...
> 
> What is the status of Callweaver? I see there has been progressive 
> development, or at least recent 'changesets' [1] to the codebase(stopped 
> Feb 14th, Valentines day related? :-) ), but a release has not been made 
> since nearly a year ago. Checking the milestones [2], the project seems 
> to be severely behind 'schedule'. While not a problem in and of itself, 
> it would be nice to know what the roadblocks are to the project's 
> development. Is it manpower, funding, equipment, etc?

Frankly I'm not even sure what is the current main developement branch.

Trunk seems to require an extra library that I have to build myself. Is
there any interest in it?

Is there any interest in providing packages of the whole Unicall stack?
I can easily provide it, but so far I had no real reason to upload them
to e.g. Debian (apart from SpanDSP). This complex stack (some 3 or 4
layers of dependencies) makes life interesting for anybody who want to
build CallWeaver.

Another issue is: has anybody looked into the security advisories by
Asterisk to see which of them applies to CallWeaver? Have the relevant
fixes been applied?

When I wanted to package CallWeaver (1.2.1 (?)) for Debian I encountered
some issues with automake. Specifically, modules would get rebild on
'make install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp .

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:[email protected]
+972-50-7952406           mailto:[email protected]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[email protected]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
Callweaver-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev

Reply via email to