> -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di > Antonio Gallo > Inviato: lunedì 22 ottobre 2007 13.56 > A: Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Oggetto: Re: [Callweaver-users] R: R: Sip NAT question--- OR BUG ? > > Andrea Lanza ha scritto: > > nat setting per peer does not override default global nat > setting it > > seems to me a bug, but...... > > If you check chan_sip.c into the function that do the testing > the peer testing is done *before* the global testing, this > should not be a problem. > > CtRiX should write a FAQ about the new NAT implementation, > its seemed to act very differently from old asterisk-like thing. > > _______________________________________________ > Callweaver-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users > sorry, I don't understand... Wherever the check is done... if I see into my log about 1 thousand time
Nat is needed and Reliably Transmitting (NAT) to 192.168.100.145:5060 and never: Nat is not needed and Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.100.146:5060: I believe callweaver and chan sip is ACTUALLY doing and using nat... Then we can speak about the absence of difference in using nat or not using nat on the same address, but... Andrea
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
