Thomas Kenyon wrote: > I think we're all hoping it to be alive enough to know that it's still > being worked on. > > Callweaver still has a lot of advantages over Asterisk, I have a server > that will (hopefully) soon be moving to an office as a test replacement > for the asterisk server there. (The T.38 functionality and the G.722 > codec will be surprisingly helpful).
Okay, so asterisk 1.6 supports G.722, so maybe I got that a bit wrong. _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
