On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas van dem Helge wrote: > > > I've never "used" callweaver beyond (attempting) testing the broken > > T38Gateway. The day it works I might consider switching. For now I'll > > keep on using Asterisk. Digium generally don't add features that are > > broken and remain that way for years.... usually they release these > > things called bugfixes. > > > Then I suggest you go and use their well fixed T.38 gateway.
At least what they develop and claim does work actually does. T38 SIP pass through with a Cisco gateway has been working pretty well for me. Hasn't worked with some other setups, but I cannnot vouch for the T.38 implementations of the other equipment I have used. Replacing Cisco gateway with CallWeaver T38Gateway simply does not work and noone seems to have any interest in fixing it. On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:25 PM, CtRiX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oh! > was t38 gateway released ? > and oh... was callweaver released? Yes it was released, otherwise how did I download it? I really don't like hacking into other people's systems to obtain unreleased software, generally. > apart from that, i really appreciate your cohoperation through testing > the t38 gateway feature. > Thanks for all the reports you have made and the help you provided us to > improve. I know you are being sarcastic. When I posted multiple time about my issues simply I was told to read the wiki and that it "does work" yet noone was able to provide a working configuration... how odd. _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
