mm_202 wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Now that we finally have a release (a large thank you to everyone that > was involved and to the community as a whole), > I think that we should try to get our Wikipedia article back. > > We had one for a short time last year, but it was deleted because it > 'lacked notability'. One of the things that they kept > bringing up is that it didnt even have an actual release. [btw, some > of the largest proponents for deleting it were users > that maintained the Asterisk Article on Wikipedia, so obviously it was > very unbiased...] > > For the fun little debate: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CallWeaver > [and as it saids, please dont modify that page] > > Anyways, as I said, I think that its time to get our wiki page back. > I think that it would greatly increase the awareness > that there is a better alternative to Asterisk. I would start the > page myself, but Im the one that started it last time and > Im sure that they'll point that out when they try to delete it again. > Anyone willing to at least start the article? > > Also, if anyone has time, the voip-info wiki should be updated as > well; to at least say that we have a stable release. > > > Again, thank you to everyone who has helped us get this far! > My advice is not to try to get any articles in Wikipedia. Go for reputable media instead. Things like Playboy, Hustler, and The National Inquirer. You know, things with a lot more credibility than Wikipedia. Once they pick it up, Wikipedia will eventually follow.
I would actively campaign to have anything of mine *removed* from Wikipedia. Why would I want articles about my work thrown in a cesspit? Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
