A good thing, or something that your gut thinks is good? :) +1 on having a metadata file like this.
On 12 February 2016 13:48:26 GMT+00:00, "Guido Günther" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:45:58AM +0100, chrysn wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:16:42PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: >> > THere is already such a setting called 'is-calendar'. >> > >> > E.g. my calendar collection contains the following >.calypso-collection >> > configuration file: >> >> it's nice to see those patches used, but they are only in patch >queues >> so far. >> >> they do meddle with the way calypso is configured -- i think for the >> better, and we don't block the road towards having metadata where it >now >> is (inside .git directories as it is now for descriptions, maybe we >> out-of-band the other metadata on demand as well). >> >> so no functionality is impeded by them, but a direction is set, both >for >> what is contained in the repositories and for the user interface. >> basically i think it boils down to deciding on calypso's style. > >I'm fine with your current approach since this information is then also >under version control which is a gut thing. >Cheers, > -- Guido
_______________________________________________ Calypso mailing list [email protected] http://keithp.com/mailman/listinfo/calypso
