IN CAMBODIA OCCUPIED BY VIETNAM AGAINST 10 UN RESOLUTIONS 1979-2008.
 
THE UN TRIBUNAL HAS CONSUMED MORE THAN 54 MILLIONS DOLLARS ALREADY,with no 
progress,  SHOWING A TOTAL INCOMPETENCE AND COMPLACENCY among those 
responsibles in omitting to read THE 10 UN RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE VIETNAMESE 
INVASION AND OCCUPATION OF CAMBODIA.
 
 
Q: KR victims accuse Verges of "playing games," call on judges to bar him from 
court 
 

 
A: Really ?
 
VERY INTERESTING AND EXCITING GAMES BETWEEN PLAYERS :
 
a. Vietnam the invader country
b. China 
c. UN 
d...etc....
e...DUCH is a Vietnamese , Hor Nam Hong is a vietnamese, Ieng Sary is a 
Vietnamese, the 4 Tioun brothers are Vietnamese, Keat Chhon married to a 
Vietnamese wife.....
 
Causes of the war between the KR of Pol Pot regime and the Vietnamese invaders.
-Koh Tral , and other islands occupied by the Vietnamese since 1970 and in 1975 
-cease fire  offerted by the Vietnamese not accepted by the KR , while the Viet 
troops remains in Cambodia.
-then the Vietnamese troops of invasion of Cambodia in December 1978 and 
Occupation of Cambodia from 1979-2008. 
-this evidence showing that THE CHINESE LEADERS ARE LIARS AND CHEATER AS OF 
TODAY.
March 22, 1970 Prince Sihanouk meets with Zhou Enlai in Beijing and is told: 
"... China is determined to support Your Highness until Your Highness returns 
to his own country in victory. So long as Your Highness is determined to fight 
to the end, it is for certain that we will provide Your Highness with our 
support....
Prince Sihanouk: With China's support, I will persist in the struggle. No 
matter how long the struggle will last and how many difficulties it will 
endure, I will never yield.
 
On Dec. 25, 1978 Invasion of Cambodia. 
Some 100,000 Vietnamese with 20,000 KUFNS troops, under the direction of Gen. 
Van Tien Dung, launch an invasion of Cambodia. 
 
Jan. 11, 1979 The UN Security Council agreed, over the objections of the Soviet 
Union and Czechoslovakia, to let Prince Norodom Sihanouk present a demand for 
the withdrawal of Vietnamese forces from Cambodia. 
The Vietnamese communists , the Chinese friends, continued to disobey the UN 
resolutions:Oct. 21, 1986 The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution 
A/RES/41/6, by vote of 116-21 with 13 abstentions, calling for a withdrawal of 
Vietnamese forces from Cambodia.As of today, Cambodia is still occupied by the 
Vietnamese troops despite the call from the US president to Vietnam to cease 
her occupation of Cambodia since 1988. Cambodia needs Independence from Vietnam 
and the Vietnamese invaders. America calls Vietnam to restore Cambodia 
Independence .President Reagan's address to the 43d Session of the United 
Nations General Assembly in New York, New York . September 26, 1988. "Mr. 
Secretary-General, there are new hopes for Cambodia, a nation whose freedom and 
independence we seek just as avidly as we sought thefreedom and independence of 
Afghanistan. We urge the rapid removal of all Vietnamese troops ...."THE 
CHINESE LEADERS REMAINS SILENT ON THIS ISSUE , ALLOWING THE VIETNAMESE TO 
OCCUPY CAMBODIA AGAINST THE 10 UN RESOLUTIONS, WHILE CHINA HAS PROMISED 
SIAHNOUK TO SUPPORT THE INDEPENDENCE OF CAMBODIA ?THE CHINESE COMMUNISTS 
LEADERS ARE LIARS VIS A VIS THE CAMBODIAN PEOPLE,so are the Vietnamese 
invaders... Bury
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



THESE ARE KHMER WOMEN VICTIMS .
BUT DUCH. the butcher  is a Vietnamese Dec 05, 2008By Elena in Khieu Samphan, 
ECCCThe Tribunal ReportThe Post.blogs
As anyone who has spent time in Cambodia knows, people in this country 
generally go to great lengths to avoid overt confrontation. So the verbal 
sparring that erupted at a post-hearing press conference Thursday revealed the 
extent to which Khmer Rouge survivors were offended -- and even enraged -- by 
the antics of Khieu Samphan's defense team.Center ring was Jacques Verges, 
Samphan's French co-lawyer. A bombastic character who has made a career 
defending notorious clients like Nazi Klaus Barbie, he returned to the ECCC to 
once again argue that all the documents in Khieu's case file be translated into 
French. Because the court has refused to provide adequate translation -- and 
thus violated Khieu's rights -- the former Khmer Rouge head of state should be 
released from provisional detention, Verges argued. A decision on the defense's 
appeal is due at a later date.True to reputation, Verges' appearance at the 
hearing had a theatrical flair. (Recently, he has been performing a one-man 
show, Serial Plaideur, in Paris). Verges accused Co-Prosecutors of "mocking" 
him and said he felt like he was in "a third world market bargaining to receive 
translations.""I am wearing a robe that gives me dignity and I am not wearing 
the slippers of a servant," Verges told the court. "... I laugh in the face of 
your threats."As the hearing adjourned, Verges and his similarly animated 
Cambodian counterpart, Sa Sovan, were swarmed by media. They continued to 
lambaste the court at a press conference and challenged the Co-Prosecutors to a 
debate. But victims in the audience quickly lost patience with the defense 
lawyers' arguments and demeanor."You, co-lawyer, you speak too much," a 
diminutive woman called out from the audience. "Why not let the victims speak 
too? We are here but we cannot speak."The exchange quickly devolved into a 
shouting match, with Sa Sovan rebuking and pointing accusatorily at the woman, 
before court staff escorted him and Verges out of the room.A much less eventful 
presentation by the Co-Prosecutors followed, and afterwards, the victims were 
allowed to have their say. Most expressed anger with Khieu's defense team, 
saying the lawyers had no respect for victims or for the court."Please don't 
play games with the souls of 1.7 million dead people," one civil party pleaded. 
"You are performing a circus."Several called on the ECCC to bar Verges from the 
tribunal. No doubt he will get some mileage out of this -- Verges already 
repeatedly invokes the judges' previous suggestion that Khieu replace him after 
he refused to participate in his client's April hearing.Thursday's incident was 
the first time I have seen such an outburst of emotion at the tribunal. I had 
wondered how Verges' notoriously dramatic courtroom style would go over in 
Cambodia, and I think this reaction offers a preliminary answer. Victims were 
deeply offended by what they perceived as a flippant attitude toward the court, 
and to their own suffering.At the same time, while Verges is an unusually 
outspoken attorney (here, anyway), what many Cambodians see as "game playing" 
is standard in most western courts. Defense attorneys are often accused of 
being obstructionist -- delaying proceedings and nitpicking over seemingly 
insignificant issues are common strategies they use to represent clients.This 
may be hard for people here to grasp, considering the lack of standard 
courtroom procedure and due process in the Cambodian judicial system. The fact 
that most people already believe the defendants are guilty adds a further level 
of complication.Once again, this is why education and outreach are so vital to 
the court's success. Otherwise, regular people will continue to see the ECCC as 
a money pit, where lawyers haggle over trivial concerns, while the architects 
of Democratic Kampuchea grow frailer, and closer to death.

Click to Read More...



_________________________________________________________________
Suspicious message? There’s an alert for that. 
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad2_122008
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to