There's Kangaroo court all over my Xmerland under my Xadat Hoon Xen leadersheep.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:27 AM, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > Now let us say that Hun Sen and his government swayed toward the > popularity for now. > What do you think that his court is going to look like? > Do you think that Hun Sen and his government allow that to happen? > Now, let us assume that Mu is arrested and being put in jail. > What may cause harm to Hun Sen? > What may cause harm to Mu? > Who is more vulnerable than whom? > Let me tell you the fact. Hun Sen and his government is not going to > make their court look like a kangaroo court. They are going to stand > on their decision because the evidence is very clear on this case. > There is no injustice. Even a weak court can judge on it. So Mu is > going to jail, and she is going to loose. > Look at her boss. He is facing the same problem. What is he doing ? > He is betting on the pressure from the international community. > Has the Cambodian government felt the pressure from the international > community yet? > They are not going to put their hands in there because Sam Rainsy was > accused of something with facts. What sam rainsy is arguing about is > something else different from that court case. > Don't allow your sentiment to taint the judgement of a court. > > A white police officer was convicted of a manslaughter for shooting a > black man. > The community has been crying for the injustice. > What is the injustice? > Let us look at it. > > Penal Code 187 states that Murder is : > 1- an act of killing a human > 2- with malice forethought. > > The jury could not find any evidence to support the malice > forethought. So they could not convict him with Murder of PC187. > > Now let us look at Mu. > She claimed that she was verbally harrassed by Hun Sen in his speech. > There was no mentioning of Mu's name in that speech. > So the court had to reject that claim because it was based on WHAT SHE > WAS THINKING, not fact. > Then she went out rampling everything creating evidence for Hun Sen > to counter suit her, which he did. > She lost in court. > She lost on all of her appeals. > > So don't think that your sentiment will help her case. It won't. > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:27 AM, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > Now let us say that Hun Sen and his government swayed toward the > popularity for now. > What do you think that his court is going to look like? > Do you think that Hun Sen and his government allow that to happen? > Now, let us assume that Mu is arrested and being put in jail. > What may cause harm to Hun Sen? > What may cause harm to Mu? > Who is more vulnerable than whom? > Let me tell you the fact. Hun Sen and his government is not going to > make their court look like a kangaroo court. They are going to stand > on their decision because the evidence is very clear on this case. > There is no injustice. Even a weak court can judge on it. So Mu is > going to jail, and she is going to loose. > Look at her boss. He is facing the same problem. What is he doing ? > He is betting on the pressure from the international community. > Has the Cambodian government felt the pressure from the international > community yet? > They are not going to put their hands in there because Sam Rainsy was > accused of something with facts. What sam rainsy is arguing about is > something else different from that court case. > Don't allow your sentiment to taint the judgement of a court. > > A white police officer was convicted of a manslaughter for shooting a > black man. > The community has been crying for the injustice. > What is the injustice? > Let us look at it. > > Penal Code 187 states that Murder is : > 1- an act of killing a human > 2- with malice forethought. > > The jury could not find any evidence to support the malice > forethought. So they could not convict him with Murder of PC187. > > Now let us look at Mu. > She claimed that she was verbally harrassed by Hun Sen in his speech. > There was no mentioning of Mu's name in that speech. > So the court had to reject that claim because it was based on WHAT SHE > WAS THINKING, not fact. > Then she went out rampling everything creating evidence for Hun Sen > to counter suit her, which he did. > She lost in court. > She lost on all of her appeals. > > So don't think that your sentiment will help her case. It won't. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. > This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. > Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc > Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
