It sounds good.
We'd better to be on the track of Camel 2.0 ASAP :)
Willem
Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Oh Willem wanted to do the verbs. Well he and Jonathan can get it sorted.
> Willem could also continue doing his important work on camel-cxf.
>
> Hadrian I doubt we have time to do anything for Camel 2.0.0 about your great
> ideas of having the DSL auto generated. This is something for the future such
> as Camel 3.0. 2.0 needs the API fixed and improved performance without all
> the copying. And then better camel-jbi integration as well.
>
> So I guess we should let Willem and Jonathan have green lights for DSL
> renaming.
>
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 6. november 2008 10:32
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not
>
> Sounds good!
>
>
> 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi
>>
>> I propose a work plan such as:
>>
>> You and Hadrian should work on the remaining issues with refactoring the API
>> to remove the generics and get it as correct. You are the best people for
>> this work. Also very important that you guys look at the "remove unneeded
>> copies of exchanges".
>>
>> Then Jonathan can work on the renaming of the DSL's. And he could also help
>> removing the stuff that has been marked as @deprecated. He has already done
>> some of this stuff before. And as a 2nd priority to find the gaps in the
>> spring DSL vs. Java DSL.
>>
>> I would like to use this break to focus on the wiki documentation and my
>> tutorial that I need to continue on part 5.
>>
>>
>> Med venlig hilsen
>>
>> Claus Ibsen
>> ......................................
>> Silverbullet
>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>> 8362 Hørning
>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 6. november 2008 10:20
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and what not
>>
>> 2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Yeah could be a good idea to let 2.0.0 solely be focused on changing the
>>> API.
>>> - generics
>>> - verbs for DSL
>>> - remove @deprecated stuff
>>>
>>> And then we can be back on track with hammering 200+ issues every 3rd month.
>> Yeah! I kinda think we should focus almost exclusively on the stuff
>> that might result in API changes ASAP. e.g. how fast can we get Camel
>> when its being used as a JMS <-> JMS router or a JBI <-> JBI router.
>>
>>
>> --
>> James
>> -------
>> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>> http://fusesource.com/
>>
>
>
>
