Yeah, that's not a problem. There's gonna be a big api change anyway.
What I think is also important is fixing the dependencies (remove the
circular deps), this will allow us to move forward with a cleaner api.
Hadrian
On Nov 6, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
It sounds good.
We'd better to be on the track of Camel 2.0 ASAP :)
Willem
Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
Oh Willem wanted to do the verbs. Well he and Jonathan can get it
sorted. Willem could also continue doing his important work on
camel-cxf.
Hadrian I doubt we have time to do anything for Camel 2.0.0 about
your great ideas of having the DSL auto generated. This is
something for the future such as Camel 3.0. 2.0 needs the API fixed
and improved performance without all the copying. And then better
camel-jbi integration as well.
So I guess we should let Willem and Jonathan have green lights for
DSL renaming.
Med venlig hilsen
Claus Ibsen
......................................
Silverbullet
Skovsgårdsvænget 21
8362 Hørning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk
-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6. november 2008 10:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and
what not
Sounds good!
2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
I propose a work plan such as:
You and Hadrian should work on the remaining issues with
refactoring the API to remove the generics and get it as correct.
You are the best people for this work. Also very important that
you guys look at the "remove unneeded copies of exchanges".
Then Jonathan can work on the renaming of the DSL's. And he could
also help removing the stuff that has been marked as @deprecated.
He has already done some of this stuff before. And as a 2nd
priority to find the gaps in the spring DSL vs. Java DSL.
I would like to use this break to focus on the wiki documentation
and my tutorial that I need to continue on part 5.
Med venlig hilsen
Claus Ibsen
......................................
Silverbullet
Skovsgårdsvænget 21
8362 Hørning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk
-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6. november 2008 10:20
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Discussion] - Camel 1.5.1 - What should we add and
what not
2008/11/6 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
Yeah could be a good idea to let 2.0.0 solely be focused on
changing the API.
- generics
- verbs for DSL
- remove @deprecated stuff
And then we can be back on track with hammering 200+ issues every
3rd month.
Yeah! I kinda think we should focus almost exclusively on the stuff
that might result in API changes ASAP. e.g. how fast can we get
Camel
when its being used as a JMS <-> JMS router or a JBI <-> JBI router.
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com/
