On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Camel has a good and diverse self sustaining community and
> that it should aim to be a TLP now.
> Being a subproject of ActiveMQ is no more relevant imho.
> So I'd like to start writing a proposal that would be submitted to the board.
> We would have to come with a project charter, decide what the PMC list
> will be and find a PMC chair.
> Help and feedback welcomed !
I have been pondering this for a while as well. I think it would be a
very good move for Camel since it's applicable to far more than just
ActiveMQ. One of the first questions I receive when I speak about
Camel is why it is a subproject of ActivMQ and my response is simply
that that's where the project began. I would definitely +1 such a
move, but the question is should we do it now or wait for the 2.0
release? I think such a move should take place before the 2.0 release.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
