+1 on both, I think this is the right way to go. On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> decide what the PMC list >>>> will be and find a PMC chair. >>> >>> >>> Hmmm... maybe I'm not allowed to discuss this bit cause I'm not on the >>> ActiveMQ PMC ;) >>> >>> >> >> Nonsense.. It's important we clarify all the points in the proposal. >> >> I think the easiest way to build the initial PMC will be ask for >> volunteers from the existing ActiveMQ PMC to step up to be on the new >> Camel PMC. Then ask the new PMC to nominate a chair from the >> community. Get the TLP done and have the PMC vote in new PMC members >> in the normal Apache way. >> > > Oh we would need to do a similar thing for the committer list.. > pollthe ActiveMQ committers to see which ones want to join the Camel > TLP as committers. > >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >>> >>>> >>>> Help and feedback welcomed ! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Open Source SOA >>>> http://fusesource.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Jon >>> >>> http://janstey.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://open.iona.com >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > Open Source SOA > http://open.iona.com >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
