[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=47758#action_47758
]
Jonathan Anstey commented on CAMEL-1099:
----------------------------------------
Claus, I wouldn't spend too much time on the MemoryIdempotentRepository, I
don't think many users would want to use this in a production scenario (the
file and jpa options are much more attractive). The best we can do in this case
is recommend the LRU cache option so the memory doesn't get too out of hand I
guess.
> File consumer should keep track of processed files
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1099
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1099
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core, camel-ftp, camel-spring
> Reporter: Jonathan Anstey
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> See thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/Deprecation-of-file-consumer-timestamp-td20566034s22882.html
> Will be following Gert's suggestion of multiple implementations for the
> storage mechanism so many use cases can be covered:
> - an in-memory store for testing purposes
> - a file-based implementation for basic production environments
> - a database- or ldap-backed implementation for clustered environments, where
> a file can arrive through multiple directories
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
