[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=47780#action_47780
]
Jonathan Anstey commented on CAMEL-1099:
----------------------------------------
So when there is a miss on the LRUCache, the file repository would be queried
(and this is the only case that it would queried)? I'm just wondering what kind
of format we want for this kinda file... having it appended to with every add
seems to imply that it would be a big list that we'd have to scroll through
(very slow). Maybe I'm missing an obvious solution, it is early here :)
> File consumer should keep track of processed files
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1099
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1099
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core, camel-ftp, camel-spring
> Reporter: Jonathan Anstey
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> See thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/Deprecation-of-file-consumer-timestamp-td20566034s22882.html
> Will be following Gert's suggestion of multiple implementations for the
> storage mechanism so many use cases can be covered:
> - an in-memory store for testing purposes
> - a file-based implementation for basic production environments
> - a database- or ldap-backed implementation for clustered environments, where
> a file can arrive through multiple directories
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
