[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=48021#action_48021
]
James Strachan commented on CAMEL-1171:
---------------------------------------
I was thinking maybe the to() methods could take as a 2nd optional argument an
ExchangePattern - if folks wanted to use the uncommon stuff (RobustInOut etc).
then inOnly(uri|endpoint) would be shorthand for to(uri|endpoint, InOnly) and
ditto for inOut(uri|endpoint)
> add from(....).inOnly("....") or from("...").inOut("....") to allow explicit
> ExchangePatterns to be specified in the routing DSL
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1171
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1171
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: James Strachan
> Assignee: Willem Jiang
> Fix For: 1.5.1, 2.0.0
>
>
> Right now the *to* will use the current default pattern that an endpoint
> prefers. It would be good to allow it to be explicitly specified in the route.
> Not 100% sure the best names to use - is *inOnly()* and *inOut()* the best?
> Maybe *oneway()* and *request()*?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
