[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=48057#action_48057
]
James Strachan commented on CAMEL-1171:
---------------------------------------
:) it was my duff suggestion to use it the other way around to start with :)
Just about done - gonna commit this minor change shortly.
BTW made another minor change - the ToType now can take an ExchangePattern
constructor argument as well - so that when sending to an endpoint (the common
use case for the inOut/inOnly methods), we don't need 2 steps in the route
> add from(....).inOnly("....") or from("...").inOut("....") to allow explicit
> ExchangePatterns to be specified in the routing DSL
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1171
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1171
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: James Strachan
> Assignee: James Strachan
> Fix For: 1.5.1, 2.0.0
>
>
> Right now the *to* will use the current default pattern that an endpoint
> prefers. It would be good to allow it to be explicitly specified in the route.
> Not 100% sure the best names to use - is *inOnly()* and *inOut()* the best?
> Maybe *oneway()* and *request()*?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
