> Robert Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >I suggest you check with Hearst about that.
> >
>   Seems to me from reading the "Duration..." paragraph, that an
> article 
> published in 1942 is incontestably in the public domain, no matter
> what 
> Hearst says... RKS
> 

And if you're *still* worried, contact the publisher and ask for a back issue to be 
sent to you.


Wayne Harridge

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge
_______________________________________________
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers

Reply via email to