> Robert Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I suggest you check with Hearst about that. > > > Seems to me from reading the "Duration..." paragraph, that an > article > published in 1942 is incontestably in the public domain, no matter > what > Hearst says... RKS > And if you're *still* worried, contact the publisher and ask for a back issue to be sent to you. Wayne Harridge http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge _______________________________________________ Cameramakers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers
- [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Marv Soloff
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Jim
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Robert Mueller
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Joe Herdler
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Marv Soloff
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files m . gudzinowicz
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Marv Soloff
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Robert Stoddard
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Wayne Harridge
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files m . gudzinowicz
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Marv Soloff
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Robert Mueller
- Re: Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Wayne Harridge
- Re: Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files m . gudzinowicz
- Re: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Alan Zinn
- RE: [Cameramakers] Popular Mechanics Files Edge, Rory