On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Gerd Stolpmann <i...@gerd-stolpmann.de> wrote: > > There could be an alternative: The "busybox approach". We could develop > a toolkit that covers all the Unix commands we need for the existing > build scripts. It would include easy things like cp, mv etc., but also a > classic "make" (medium difficulty, note that it could reuse the > godi_make code), and especially a POSIX shell. The latter is a bit of > work, but not too much. I'd guess the overall effort takes not more than > 1-2 weeks if done by somebody how knows the semantics of the tools very > well.
does mingw+msys not already do this? the last time i checked, it shipped with rxvt, bash and bunch of natively compiled standard posix utilities. martin -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
