Do you have a sense of how hard this would be to fix? It would be lovely to have some reasonable namespace control without having to take chunks of the namespace as all-or-nothing pieces....
y On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Alain Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Teller wrote: > >> I thought the linker only linked in symbols which were actually used? >> > > No, it is not the case. > > The only automatic mechanism for code pruning is at the level of individual > modules embedded in a library. As soon as you pack, you obtain a monolithic > module which can only be linked as a whole. > > -- Alain > > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >
_______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
