On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 07:05:17PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Still, if using it thoroughly we are back to the square 1 of having to > > link everything together, then it is not a viable solution for large > > libraries. > > ...or maybe it's time to have shared libraries (≠ plugins).
ACK, though that is orthogonal. Even with shared libraries I don't want to have link relationships with modules whose symbols I don't use, no matter how the symbols where -pack ed together. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
