2009/3/24 John Prince <john.pri...@colorado.edu> > I'm new to ocaml and coming (most recently) from ruby,
... > Can someone point me to the best resource(s) for newbies? I have been > reading through what's out there, but its always nice to get a > recommendation. > I also started learning OCaml this year. Here's my personal experience and recommendations on tutorial that are freely available: Begin with 20 min reading at Wikipedia to get some context of the lang as perceived by programers in general: • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocaml The following are quality material, that you can get hands on experience as a intro, each worth about 8 hours of study: • Ocaml for Scientists, by Jon Harrop, chapter 1 free: http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/chapter1.html • “Introduction to Caml” by Scott Smith of Johns Hopkins U. A lecture note. http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~scott/pl/lectures/caml-intro.html The above 2 are similar. Once you did the above, you might want a full length tutorial, treating major aspects of the lang in some detail. Here's 2 i found available: • Developing Applications With Objective Caml, By Emmanuel Chailloux - Pascal Manoury - Bruno Pagano at: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/oreilly-book/html/index.html • Introduction to Objective Caml, by Jason Hickey, 2008. (draft) http://www.cs.caltech.edu/courses/cs134/cs134b/book.pdf Currently, i'm still reading chapter 2 of the Emmanuel book. Started to read Jason too. (i like concurrently reading multiple references) I also started to write my own. Expect it to be in some usable form in a year. It is written for practical programers, and those from so-called “scripting” lang background (e.g. php, perl, python, javascript, Mathematica, newlisp, tcl, ruby), and with the view point that prog langs are primarily syntax (i.e. a computatable math notation.). • OCaml Basics http://xahlee.org/ocaml/ocaml_basics.html --------------------------------------- the following are the most visible ocaml tutorials, but are low quality, blog like, full of misleading characterizations, irrevelancies, misleading comparisons. The type that you'd spend hours on and got more confused, regardless whether you are a expert logician or expert industrial programer. These tutorial's quality and nature are similar to the ones you'd find of the freely bundled official tutorials from perl, java, or even haskell. Typically written as a revised diary of learning experiences by student programers, or by academicians who are llliterate in technical writing. • intro to ocaml, from official site http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual003.html • “Objective CAML Tutorial”, most cited tutorial on the web http://www.ocaml-tutorial.org/ There are 3 or so more ocaml tutorials i've looked on the web, from the first page of google search with word “ocaml tutorial”. I don't think they are not worth your time. ------------------------- I'd be good if the ocaml managers perhaps thru some arrangement, to borrow Jon Harrop's chapter 1, or other quality sources, in replacement of the tutorial on the official site. Because, a quailty tutorial bundled with the official release has great impact. The official tutorial makes the first impression of the lang for most people. Xah ∑ http://xahlee.org/ ☄
_______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
